|
Question #1: Please describe your understanding of the causes and consequences of the housing affordability challenges that our community faces and the ways you advocate for the City and County to address these challenges.
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Housing affordability is a key component of community health. People who own their homes are more involved in their local community organizations, maintain their property, and interact with their neighbors. In recent years, skyrocketing housing prices created an ownership problem in Whatcom County. Housing prices rose due to a nationwide speculative bubble and easy credit, combined with a local boom as the rest of the world discovered our northwest paradise. At this time, it is very difficult for local wage earners to purchase a home, as wages did not keep pace with housing prices.
I do not believe we have a supply issue. The inventory in Whatcom County has tripled in the last year, and housing prices have still risen. I believe we need market-based incentives to affordable housing. No matter how many 5,000 square foot view homes we build on King Mountain, they will never be "affordable." We need smaller houses on smaller lots. We should award density bonuses to developers who build smaller houses.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #2: Do you see housing affordability as an environmental issue? Why or why not?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Yes, because as housing prices increase, those with lower incomes move further from population and employment centers. That is the "drive til you qualify" effect, and it is not a sustainable solution. We want to encourage less driving and less conversion of our rural and resource lands - those are serious environmental issues. We have to provide affordable housing options within our existing urban areas, near employment, shopping, entertainment, and schools.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #3: Evaluate Bellingham/Whatcom County's performance in addressing homelessness? Please be specific.
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Bellingham has a difficult situation, as our border, coastline and mountainous regions collect a disproportionate share of people without roots, without jobs, and without housing. We need to recognize the ripple effects this can have on our community. I think we do a worthy job of supporting programs such as the Opportunity Council that do great work. I think we need dedicated facilities where substance abusers and/or the mentally ill can get treatment, transitional housing, and job-training skills. The most important thing we can do is give people hope and an opportunity to be self-sufficient.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #4: Please describe your approach to the budget vis-à-vis affordable housing. Specifically, among the long list of potential programs and projects that rely on the discretionary portion of the general fund, what priority would you give to programs and projects that support affordable housing?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Subsidized housing is a key component for people with disabilities - both mental and physical. However, I do not believe it is a long-term solution for the majority of the population. I will support more programs that allow market forces to provide housing, by easing permitting, increasing density, and improving profitability for the developers. Any affordable housing projects that receive priority treatment must adhere to strict design standards to fit in with neighborhoods and meet certain green-building targets.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #5: Would you support the creation of a housing trust fund, similar to the state's Housing Trust Fund but locally controlled and funded by local revenues that would help make certain homes more affordable?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
I would need to know more.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #6: Do you support the use of mandatory inclusionary zoning coupled with developer cost offsets and incentives to increase the production of rental and ownership units affordable to households at or below the local median income? Why or why not?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Possibly, but it is not my first choice. I would need to know more. I am not sure it would be effective on a large scale.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #7: Would you support a proposal to expedite the permitting process for housing projects that meet specific affordability and other public policy criteria?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
Absolutely.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #8: Some have suggested we can grow our way out of the housing price problem. Do you believe itis just a problem of too little supply? Why or why not?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
I do not agree. We have seen the inventory in our area triple in the last year, and prices have increased 5%. Our developers are building mansions on view lots - those are never going to meet the criteria for "affordable."
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |
 |
|
Question #9: Some have suggested that developing more higher wage jobs (at compensation rates to make conventional mortgages affordable) is the answer to the affordable housing crisis here. Do you agree? Why or why not?
|
| Ken Mann |
|
Sam R. Crawford |
|
I agree that higher-wage job creation is a vital component to the housing affordability solution. People can qualify for conventional loans at better rates when they have a proven income stream and can afford to make the payments. We need more living-wage jobs and we need to support our business community.
|
|
No response as of October 14 - we will post late responses within one business day of receiving them.
|
| Back to Position List |
|
Back to List of Questions |